Tag Archives: Fair Packaging and Label Act

2026 Trends in Cannabis Labeling

By Travis Wayne
1 Comment

As the cannabis industry continues to mature, labeling will continue to shape the way for product identification and consumer safety. Looking ahead to 2026, cannabis businesses face growing pressure to improve accuracy, strengthen compliance, streamline production, and build trust with both regulators and consumers. The most successful organizations will modernize their labeling workflows by focusing on three key areas: traceability, sustainability, and compliant yet compelling design.

The importance of compliant cannabis labeling

Labeling directly affects product safety, regulatory compliance, and brand reputation. As cannabis recalls continue to surface in major states such as New York, Colorado, California, and Missouri, businesses are under pressure from regulators to improve labeling compliance. In 2025, Colorado alone saw 465 recalls on cannabis products compared to the 333 recalls in 2024, according to the Colorado Department of Revenue’s Marijuana Enforcement Division.

Mislabeling, whether related to THC or CBD content, allergens, strain names, dosage instructions, or legal warnings, can quickly lead to recalls. Not only do they disrupt production, but they can also negatively impact brand reputation and be dangerous for consumers.

Labeling is no longer an operational task; it supports growth, credibility, and competitive strength. As the industry looks toward 2026, three major trends are shaping the future of cannabis labeling.

Trend 1: Traceability

Traceability is becoming one of the most critical elements of cannabis labeling. With increasingly advanced seed-to-sale tracking systems, regulators want clearer documentation of product movement, and a label serves as a key part of that chain of custody.

Label elements like Lot or batch numbers, serialization, and scannable data (such as QR codes) are now essential. These details support:

  • Faster recall execution if an issue is identified
  • Clearer accountability when liability questions arise
  • Greater confidence that what’s inside the package matches what’s on the label

This is pushing cannabis companies to adopt labeling systems that connect directly to Metrc, BioTrack, and business systems like ERP or LIMS, rather than relying on manual text entry that can lead to errors.

What this means for cannabis businesses:

Businesses should prioritize label security and traceability software. Labeling software like that can give you full control and traceability of label design, secure label storage in a central repository, and accurate printing to support compliance with cannabis regulations. Being able to reprint accurate labels quickly, maintain audit trails, and prove data integrity may ultimately protect brands both legally and operationally. With security and traceability software, eliminate questions like “who approved label 9?” or “why is file version 14 final?” and ensure full traceability of your labels.

Trend 2: Sustainable labeling

Sustainability has become a defining factor in packaging conversations across consumer goods industries, and cannabis is no exception. Environmentally conscious consumers want greener options, and brands must respond by rethinking their packaging and labeling materials.

However, sustainable labeling in cannabis isn’t as simple as switching material types. Labels must be durable enough to withstand handling, moisture, refrigeration, and regulatory print requirements while remaining legible throughout the product lifecycle.

Growing areas of focus include:

  • Recyclable or compostable label materials
  • Linerless labels that reduce material waste
  • Smarter printing workflows to limit rework

Sustainability isn’t only about material selection; inefficiency is also waste. Incorrect or damaged labels can lead to unnecessary waste and higher labeling costs due to additional rework. Professional labeling software can help reduce reprints by ensuring accuracy from the start.

What this means for cannabis businesses:

Businesses should carefully evaluate material options and label with a provider that understands the nuances of cannabis labeling. Businesses can also get a sustainability win by automating their label printing. Automation integrates your existing seed-to-sale system to send print jobs to virtually any number of printers in a fraction of a second. It can also help reduce labeling errors by removing manual processes. Ultimately, automation is the most effective way to reduce waste in the labeling process.

Trend 3: Professional, compliant labeling

Cannabis labels must now do more than ever: communicate compliance details, ensure safety and clarity, and remain a powerful branding tool, all while remaining compliant. Cannabis labeling requirements vary by state, but the core requirements generally remain the same.

Cannabis labels need to include:

  • Product name
  • Prominent THC/CBD potency information
  • Batch or Lot number
  • Mandatory warnings and legal text
  • Ingredient or allergen statements
  • Child safety and responsible use messaging
  • Brand identity elements such as logos, colors, and storytelling

A brand’s product label should be unique and creative, telling the product’s story and how the business wants consumers to feel when purchasing it. However, arguably more important is ensuring compliance.

What this means for cannabis businesses:

Labels should be visually appealing and market-ready, but every design decision must support regulatory compliance and consumer trust. Professional cannabis label design software allows brands to achieve both. Some labeling providers offer state-specific cannabis label samples that companies can leverage to help create compliant labels.

Case Study: Green Aloha modernized its labeling

Modernizing labeling can be as simple as switching your manual labeling process to professional label design software. Green Aloha is an example of a cannabis business that needed stronger labeling. Green Aloha grows all its cannabis on the island of Kauai, Hawaii. To comply with new state regulatory requirements, the information Green Aloha previously listed on an insert with packages must now be included on the small package labels.

Green Aloha used TEKLYNX’s proprietary Confident LIMS label printing form, which includes four predefined label templates in CODESOFT label design software, 18–24 variable data fields (net weight, percentage of each cannabinoid, dosage, etc.), and a QR code dynamically linked to sample test results. The results?

  • Met label compliance in less than a week
  • Avoided closure and lost revenue
  • Reached 100% labeling accuracy

Read the full case study.

How to keep labeling running smoothly in 2026

Labeling connects compliance, consumer safety, and brand credibility. With recalls becoming more frequent and liability questions more complex, labeling accuracy and accountability are no longer optional.

In 2026, the cannabis leaders will be those who embrace smarter labeling strategies built around traceability, sustainability, and professional-looking labels. These aren’t just trends shaping the industry’s future; they’re the foundation of cannabis labeling.

Product Labeling Law: A Primer and a Warning for California Cannabis Executives

By Jonathan C. Sandler
No Comments

What do you get when you combine a Schedule 1 federally controlled substance with a plethora of food, beverage and cosmetic entrepreneurs marketing new products to inexperienced users and then place that combustible combination into California’s plaintiff-friendly legal environment?

A lot of rich plaintiffs’ attorneys.

California continues to be a favored plaintiffs’ lawyers’ venue for filing consumer-related lawsuits against food and cosmetic companies. These lawsuits result in tens of millions in settlements each year and hundreds of millions in judgments. Staying current on statutes and trends is critical to doing business in California and cannabis companies are no exception.

While the Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) has provided very little guidance on how cannabis products should be labeled, a lack of specific regulations does not mean that there are no applicable labeling requirements for cannabis. This is particularly true in states like California that have a multitude of statutes designed to protect consumers from false or misleading advertising and labeling. Below includes a brief list to help guide companies’ labelling processes:

  1. Look to available guidance for the relevant industries. For example, food labeling of cannabis products still requires compliance with other nutritional labeling statutes. The same goes for supplements and cosmetics. The Fair Packaging and Label Act (“FPLA”) regulates labeling of all “consumer commodities” as to net contents, product identity, and manufacturer’s, packer’s or distributor’s name and location.
  2. Consider the intended use of the product as well as the directions. For example, is the product meant to be consumed all at once or should it be consumed over a period of time? Depending upon the product, this question can affect whether compliance with the FDA dietary supplements guidance is required or whether the Food Drug and Cosmetic Act applies.
  3. Consider your supply chains. This can be one of the most difficult aspects for cannabis companies that are looking to expand, but need more supply. However, keeping track of ingredients is a critical aspect to being able to defend against lawsuits. In the past, cannabis companies have been sued because they have expanded their suppliers without assuring consistency in the products and then combining inconsistent ingredients into one common product that is now mislabeled. While the Bureau of Cannabis Control testing requirements should help with some of the cannabis information, all ingredients need to be tracked and the final products tested.
  4. Cannabis companies must label their products with applicable state laws. For example, the California Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986, better known as Proposition 65 (“Prop. 65”)is being used by the plaintiffs’ bar as a basis to sue cannabis companies.
    • Prop. 65 is a statewide initiative that regulates companies that make or sell their products in California in two ways: (1) it requires companies whose products contain certain levels of chemicals to provide clear and reasonable warnings. Prop. 65 does not ban or restrict the sale of chemicals on the list or their inclusion in products, but it requires warnings if the listed chemicals are included; and (2) It prevents companies from discharging these chemicals into the state’s water supply.
    • All companies doing business in California and all products manufactured or sold in California are subject to Prop. 65 with three exceptions: (1) the company has fewer than 10 employees, (2) government agencies, or (3) the products contain less than a threshold amount of the chemicals.
    • Penalties for violations can be staggering. Prop. 65 is enforced both by the California Attorney General and private lawsuits on behalf of the California Attorney General. The potential penalties for violations of Prop. 65 include a fine of up to $2,500 per day. Additionally, one of the largest drivers of litigation is that the private enforcers (plaintiffs’ bar) can recover their attorneys’ fees. The total amount paid in settlements in 2017 was over $25 million and of the more than $18 million in judgments, $13 million was attributed to attorneys’ fees.
  5. The California Consumers Legal Remedies Act (“CLRA”) is another California statute that is intended to protect consumers from false advertising and other unfair business practices. The CLRA allows consumers to bring individual or California class action lawsuits to recover damages and enjoin the prohibited practices. The statute also allows a prevailing consumer to recover attorneys’ fees and costs. Cannabis companies need to be mindful of their representations related to their products. California courts are filled with cases involving terms like “natural” or “healthy” or “high performing.”

Product labeling, mottos and advertisements may seem straightforward, but they form the basis for hundreds of lawsuits filed every year throughout the country, and especially in California. At this stage of trying to get one’s product out the door and to the consumer, it is tempting to move quickly. However, the importance of sound research, strategy and consulting an experienced team to ensure compliance and avoid costly mistakes is critical.