Tag Archives: business strategy

Inside Iconic Tonics’ Vision for Building Enduring Cannabis Beverage Brands

By Pam Chmiel
No Comments

A wave of infused beverage brands flooded the market over the last few years. Now, the sector has entered a period of settling and reassessment, as operators pause to evaluate the real opportunity and determine the smartest path forward amid ongoing legal uncertainty.

While adult-use cannabis markets continue to struggle with launching beverage brands for structural reasons, states without adult-use dispensaries are normalizing THC consumption under the radar through hemp beverages in everyday social settings. Bars, restaurants, music venues, and event spaces are increasingly embracing hemp drinks as a familiar, socially acceptable option. Minnesota helped pave the way for normalizing THC consumption outside of dispensaries, and cities like Austin, Nashville, and Atlanta are following suit by allowing hemp beverages in traditional social environments.

To understand how seasoned operators are thinking about the new year, I spoke with Evan Eneman, a partner at Snoop Dogg’s beverage company, Iconic Tonics. Iconic Tonics represents Snoop’s Do It Fluid and Doggie Spritz beverages, as well as the Klaus brand from well-known mixologist Warren Bobrow. Eneman shared how the team is thinking about brand building, product development, and long-term strategy heading into the new year.

 

Your Story Matters

The most common advice from branding experts is simple: tell a story.

Snoop Dogg’s drink line is built around his decades-long legacy in cannabis culture. The Klaus brand’s reputation in the cocktail world brings a different, but equally intentional, narrative to the portfolio. As Eneman explains, “It’s Warren’s craft and his creativity around all things beverage that really stands out. His products are designed to reflect a true cocktail experience, using unique ingredients and pairing them in a way that tells a story. Every drink tells a story, whether it’s about the ingredients, how it’s prepared, or who you’re sharing it with.”

Bobrow formulates products aimed at regional preferences, tailoring flavor profiles to the tastes, interests, and cultural references of each market. In New York, the Klaus line has performed especially well despite limited marketing support. According to Eneman, that success reflects how closely the formulation’s sophistication aligns with New Yorkers’ palates.

 

“I think about everything from the perspective of the user and the occasion,” Eneman says. “The brand has to live in that experience with the consumer.”

 

Finding the Right Cultural Partner to Connect With Consumers

With traditional cannabis marketing heavily restricted, brands are forced to think creatively about how they reach consumers.

 

“We look for culture fit partnerships as a way to connect with consumers who are already seeking these ingredients, formats, and experiences,” Eneman says.

 

Those partners might be restaurants, live music venues, or other spaces where education and discovery about cannabis drinks can happen naturally and fit into social occasions.

For example, Iconic Tonics recently partnered with The Butcher’s Daughter and its music listening bar concept, Only The Wild Ones, with locations in New York, Austin, and Los Angeles. They launched Warren Bobrow’s terpene-only drink, Nein, to play into the non-alc movement taking over bars.

“Their entertainment arm, Only The Wild Ones, made it a natural fit. Now the drink lives on the menu, and consumers can experience a ready-to-drink cocktail infused with botanical terpenes in a setting that matches the culture,” explains Eneman.

By embedding the product within an established lifestyle brand, Iconic Tonics can introduce consumers to terpenes through a more natural process rather than heavy, education-focused marketing.

 

A Slow and Measured Approach to Market

Many beverage brands are racing to market, prioritizing early scale and short-term revenue growth to satisfy investors. Iconic Tonics is taking a different path.

The company is intentionally moving low and slow, placing brand development and long-term relevance ahead of rapid expansion.

Eneman has been observing and participating in the functional ingredients market since its earliest days and believes the category is still in its infancy. “We are barely scratching the surface of what functional beverages are,” he says. “There’s another 40 years of category building ahead of us, including infused beverages.”

 

“These are moments in time where real brand legacies are built,” Eneman continues. “They are opportunities to change consumer behavior, routines, and expectations. Functional beverages represent far more than what we are currently seeing.”

 

The Tip of the Iceberg for Functional Ingredients

Eneman sees terpenes as only one entry point into a much broader functional beverage ecosystem. While hemp, particularly THC, dominates the market due to strong consumer demand, it is also creating a pull for more differentiated functional products.

 

“Many hemp brands today are simply THC brands,” Eneman says. “That’s who they are. That’s what they do. But when the landscape shifts, they realize they may not actually have a brand or even a business.”

 

Iconic Tonics has been experimenting beyond cannabinoids with ingredients like kanna, a succulent plant native to South Africa that has been used for centuries for mood elevation and stress relief.

Kanna is part of the company’s partnership with The Butcher’s Daughter, where it is being introduced in New York, Los Angeles, and Austin. While still largely unknown to U.S. consumers, Eniman points to the significance of kanna’s deep cultural and historical roots in crafting stories that help build brands.

 

“These ingredients are similar to cannabis in that they’ve been used for thousands of years in different cultures,” he explains. “They’re finally taking hold here, much like other superfoods that entered the U.S. market over time.”

 

For Eneman, it’s less about chasing market size and more about connecting consumers to purpose-driven consumption. Just as people drink coffee for energy or turn to adaptogens for mental balance, functional beverages will increasingly be chosen based on desired effect and occasion.

 

“The size of those markets is unknown,” Eniman says. “But the function of what you’re drinking, the access to it, and the availability are shifting rapidly. That’s what’s exciting right now.”

 

Why Hemp’s Strategic Advantages Are Hard to Ignore

For beverage brands, hemp currently offers strategic advantages that the regulated market cannot match. The ability to build awareness beyond state borders, access traditional retail channels, and experiment with formulation at scale makes hemp a more attractive platform for brand development.

Regulated cannabis beverages remain constrained by limited sales channels, fragmented manufacturing and distribution requirements, and operational costs that make true craft formulations difficult to sustain. Cold-chain challenges, additional taxation, and limited retail shelf space further constrain growth.

Hemp, by contrast, allows brands to plan and execute nationally or selectively across key markets while reaching consumers in familiar settings like liquor stores, convenience stores, restaurants, and event venues.

 

“Beverage brands aren’t putting serious money into the regulated cannabis space right now because they can build in hemp,” Eneman says. “It’s the same cannabis consumer, but with a much wider audience.”

 

In Eneman’s view, the infused beverage category still has work to do on formulation, education, and normalization. Looking ahead five years, Eneman imagines walking into the same types of restaurants, bars, and lounges he frequents today, but with a back bar that features not only fine spirits, but also non-alcoholic and functionally infused THC options. “I don’t necessarily want an only THC experience confined to consumption lounges,” he says. “It’s not what consumers want, and that’s the big shift.” Creating familiar, culturally integrated, and purpose-driven experiences for consumers, wherever they choose to drink, is the future.

Listen to Evan’s full interview on the Innovating Cannabis Podcast.

also available on YouTube.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

States Are Still Missing The Mark On Social Equity

Economist, Beau Whitney, released a report on the 2024 Cannabis Business Conditions and Sentiment Survey. It states that the legal cannabis industry remains structurally unprofitable for most operators—an issue that disproportionately impacts social equity entrepreneurs. The survey found that only 27.3 percent of U.S. cannabis businesses are profitable, while 40.6 percent are breaking even and 32.2 percent are operating at a loss. Profitability gaps are even more pronounced along racial lines: 33.7 percent of white-owned cannabis businesses reported being profitable, compared to just 17.5 percent of non-white-owned operators. Whitney attributes these outcomes to systemic barriers, including limited access to capital and banking, heavy regulatory compliance costs, and punitive federal tax policy under IRS code 280E, which can push effective tax rates above 50 percent.

The same story keeps repeating over and over again. States launch social equity grants with promises to provide financial, business, and technical support to equity applicants. Time and time again, lives are ruined and dreams broken because there isn’t adequate business planning support to mitigate the risk of failure.

 

BIPOCann Leads In Colorado

Founded in 2020 by Ernest Toney, Colorado-based incubator BIPOCann was created to address this gap, which he saw early in the rollout of social equity cannabis programs around the country, where many states were focused on license access, few invested in the long-term business planning, capital support, and operational infrastructure needed to help equity operators survive beyond launch.

BIPOCann works with minority and social equity entrepreneurs to support the full lifecycle of a cannabis business, from license applications and business planning to capital raising, operational setup, and product launch. Although the organization works with founders nationwide, its core programming is centered in Colorado through a partnership with the state’s Office of Economic Development. Beginning in 2022, BIPOCann helped pilot a model that paired state-issued social equity grants of up to $50,000 with structured mentorship, ecosystem introductions, and technical assistance designed to help founders avoid common pitfalls and accelerate time to market. The program has since expanded from an initial eight-week pilot to a 15-week accelerator, and in late 2025, BIPOCann secured its first state contract. In 2026, the organization expects to support up to 60 Colorado-based cannabis businesses through a year-long combination of structured programming and ongoing advisory services.

Four years into the program, BIPOCann can produce solid data on the efficacy of the program, says Toney, “We’ve worked with over 50 unique social equity licensed businesses and helped some get their doors open, expand throughout the state, expand to multiple states, and last year, a few of our participants were awarded about a quarter of a million dollars worth of investment funds.” He estimated that about 60% are license holders and 40% are service-based businesses seeking support from the BIPOCann program.

Toney also points to the advantages of launching a cannabis brand in a mature market like Colorado. With decades of legal market history, the state already has a dense ecosystem of established operators, retailers, and service providers, giving new brands multiple avenues to promote products and build distribution quickly. That existing infrastructure—from cultivation and manufacturing to storefronts and marketing channels—can shorten the path to market and reduce the typical early-stage friction. By contrast, while newer markets often generate significant excitement, Toney notes that brands entering those markets may face delays as foundational infrastructure is still being built, limiting immediate opportunities despite long-term potential.

 

Financing Remains The Biggest Obstacle

Access to capital remains the most persistent barrier for social equity entrepreneurs. Investment opportunities have largely dried up over the past several years, particularly for first-time founders who lack operating history or personal wealth to self-finance early stages.

Toney says BIPOCann places heavy emphasis on financial literacy, pitch development, and helping founders clearly communicate their brand story. “Ultimately, we want them to be in a position where, at the end of the program, they have a pitch deck to approach angel investors or friends and family,” he says. “Even better is when they can show revenue history to demonstrate business capability.”

The program relies heavily on experienced cannabis professionals who volunteer their time to mentor participants and share real-world operational expertise. That peer-driven support, Toney says, often fills gaps left by state programs that stop short of providing ongoing guidance.

It is unclear why states continue to repeat the same mistakes. Program after program has failed to meaningfully support social equity entrepreneurs beyond the point of licensure. States need to partner with organizations like BIPOCann to implement comprehensive business training programs with ongoing operational oversight, more closely resembling how venture capital firms engage with portfolio companies. Capital alone is not enough.

 

Learn From Past Mistakes

Even in states that have touted early social equity wins, the outcomes have fallen painfully short. New York, for example, successfully awarded roughly 54 percent of adult-use licenses to social equity applicants, but its promise to deliver turnkey storefronts and meaningful financial support ultimately unraveled. The state’s reliance on public-private partnerships, including DASNY and private investment partners, led to delays, cost overruns, lawsuits, and allegations of misconduct tied to how funds were allocated and how executive compensation was structured. For many licensees, the result was months or years of uncertainty rather than the operational head start they were promised, leaving some entrepreneurs carrying rent, legal fees, and licensing costs without ever opening their doors.

California offers another cautionary tale. While the state has distributed hundreds of millions of dollars in social equity grants through local jurisdictions, the support has been uneven, slow to reach operators, and heavily dependent on municipal capacity. Many equity entrepreneurs report receiving funds after critical startup windows had already passed, or without the technical assistance needed to deploy capital effectively.

In Richmond, California, a local equity program illustrates how these breakdowns play out at the municipal level. As reported recently, the city returned more than $1.1 million in state cannabis equity funding after failing to meet reporting requirements, while a separate $600,000 grant allocation has remained stalled, leaving qualified equity applicants waiting more than a year for promised support. In some cases, California grant dollars have helped cover rent or fees, but they have failed to address deeper challenges, such as cash flow management, compliance costs, access to the supply chain, and long-term business sustainability in one of the country’s most competitive cannabis markets.

 

These failures are too common across state and local equity efforts. Access to capital without execution, accountability, or ongoing operational support is not equity. It is a system for failure. States need to partner with organizations like BIPOCann that work hand in hand with entrepreneurs to build viable businesses, not just issue licenses and grants.

Turning Crisis Into Opportunity- Navigating Cannabis Receivership Successfully

By , Gordon K. Sattro
No Comments

The age of cannabis receiverships is here. If you’re a creditor, operator, landlord, or investor in a troubled cannabis business, you have a choice: watch value evaporate, or step up and run a disciplined, court-supervised sale that maximizes recoveries and preserves the company as a going concern. Because federal prohibition blocks access to bankruptcy courts (cannabis companies can’t file Chapter 11 like other businesses), state-court receivership has become the go-to process for plant-touching companies to orderly market and sell assets under a receiver’s oversight.

Importantly, receivership doesn’t have to mean rock-bottom pricing. In cannabis especially,  where licenses are scarce and operations are fragile, real value is preserved or lost based on execution. From my experience, great outcomes come from controlling key variables, reducing buyer risk, and spotlighting a path to upside even in distress.

 

Green Life Business Group: Setting the Market in Cannabis Receiverships                                 At Green Life Business Group, we’ve been at the center of several high-visibility cannabis receiverships nationwide. Our team has designed competitive sale processes, driven bidder engagement, and closed transactions under court confirmation; often setting the market for what distressed cannabis assets can fetch. A few examples:

  • High Times / Hightimes Holding Corp.: We handled the receivership sale of the iconic High Times portfolio, marketing everything from the flagship West Hollywood dispensary to valuable IP like the domain 420.com. The process reportedly generated 36 offers in just 17 days, and ultimately the High Times magazine and Cannabis Cup brands were bought out of bankruptcy for $3.5 million. (The premium web domain 420.com alone attracted six-figure bids, underscoring the demand we tapped into.
  • StateHouse Holdings (Harborside / Urbn Leaf / Loudpack): In late 2024, we brokered what may be the largest cannabis receivership sale in U.S. history – the StateHouse Holdings asset portfolio. This statewide collection of 11 retail stores (Harborside and Urbn Leaf brands), plus cultivation, nursery, and processing facilities, boasted over $120 million in combined annual sales. Under our management, the court-supervised bidding (ending Jan 15, 2025) drew strong interest and set a new benchmark for distressed deals at this scale.
  • Element 7 (Multi-Site Retail & Licenses): In mid-2025, we ran an innovative Zoom auction for Element 7’s California portfolio – five retail/license sites located in Marina, Rio Dell, South San Francisco, Oakland, and Firebaugh. This court-ordered receivership sale was widely marketed with a June 30 bid deadline. By conducting the auction via Zoom (with upfront bidder deposits and pre-approved procedures), we maximized participation from qualified buyers across the state.
  • Canndescent: Our track record extends to distressed cultivation assets as well. We facilitated the sale of a 67,000 sq. ft. cannabis cultivation facility (part of Canndescent’s holdings) through receivership, highlighting that even large-scale grows can find eager buyers when packaged and presented correctly. This demonstrated our ability to execute receivership transactions not just in retail and brands, but also in high-value cultivation operations.

 

What Actually Maximizes Value in a Cannabis Receivership?                                                  Whether you’re a receiver, secured creditor, board member, or potential buyer, focusing on the following levers can mean the difference between a mediocre outcome and a great one:

Sell it as a going concern whenever possible: Keep the business operating (and in good standing) throughout the sale process. Retain key staff and continue serving customers if feasible. Buyers will pay a premium for continuity i.e., active licenses, sellable inventory, and revenue still flowing. Even if operations must pause, maintain all licenses in good standing and have a clear, budgeted plan to restart. The goal is to present an ongoing business, not a shuttered one, at auction.

  • Design a competitive process and prove it in court: Don’t run a secret or sloppy sale. Set up a structured, transparent bidding process and be prepared to show the judge you left no value on the table. This means establishing a secure data room with a universal NDA and requiring proof-of-funds from all interested parties. Launch a national marketing campaign to reach strategic and financial buyers (not just local operators). Publish a clear timeline (launch date, Q&A cutoff, bid deadline, auction date, court hearing) so everyone knows the rules. Whenever appropriate, use a stalking-horse bidder to set a floor price,  with reasonable overbid increments and a modest breakup fee that encourages challengers rather than deterring them. Finally, get the court to bless simple, defensible bid procedures up front. By the time you’re in court for approval, you can demonstrate a competitive, fair process that maximized value.
  • Package assets the way buyers underwrite: Present the business in the same way a buyer will evaluate it. That means providing the data that matters for each asset type. For retail dispensaries, highlight the license status, lease terms (and assignability), store performance (revenue, customer traffic, normalized margins), any local taxes or fees, and valuable assets like POS data or loyalty program stats. For cultivation or processing facilities, detail the canopy size and production capacity, yields and cost of goods by SKU, the state of environmental controls (HVAC, lighting, etc.), genetics or IP included, harvest schedules, and any offtake or tolling contracts in place. For brands and intellectual property, provide clarity on trademark ownership (classes and territories covered), domain names and social media handles, historical revenue attributable to the brand, and assurance of clean title (no hidden liens or infringement issues). In short, package each component as a turnkey opportunity with clear upside, so buyers can easily underwrite value without uncertainty.
  • De-risk the close ahead of the auction: One of the biggest value-killers is a winning bid that falls through due to transfer issues. Proactively remove as many closing uncertainties as possible before the auction. For example, work with landlords early to secure estoppel certificates and consent to assignment of leases; have those assignment documents ready in the data room. Coordinate with regulators ahead of time on change-of-ownership approvals or any required M&A filings – and set realistic timelines for transfer so bidders know what to expect. Map out any tax obligations, successor liability questions, or UCC lien releases that could affect the sale, and clearly communicate which liabilities a buyer will assume (or avoid). By delivering a near “plug-and-play” deal to the highest bidder, you increase bidder confidence and the price they’re willing to pay.
  • Tell a growth story buyers can model: Buyers pay up when they see a credible path to ROI. Offer a concise investment memo or executive summary that outlines the growth opportunity post-sale. This might include market comparables, the store’s customer demographics and trade area, any expansion or optimization projects in the pipeline, and even a 13-week cash flow forecast to bridge the business through the closing period. Show how the buyer can step in and quickly ramp revenue or profitability. When bidders can easily model the upside, they are more likely to bid aggressively rather than low-ball for perceived risk.

 

Why Receiverships Are Surging (and What It Means for Pricing)                                               The recent surge in cannabis receiverships is no coincidence. Legal operators are struggling under crippling tax burdens and fierce illicit-market competition, which squeeze margins and cash flow. In some cases, companies are also saddled with heavy debts or legal liabilities from ambitious mergers and expansions that didn’t pan out (for example, Gold Flora’s 2023 merger left it absorbing a partner’s $575 million burn rate). All these pressures have pushed more operators into court-monitored sales as a last resort to repay creditors.

The good news is that a well-run receivership process can still attract capable buyers and command respectable valuations – even in today’s stressed market. By removing liens and uncertainties, keeping the licenses alive, and running a competitive auction, distressed cannabis assets don’t have to sell for pennies on the dollar. With multiple bidders and a clear path to operation, receivership sales can approach fair market value rather than true “fire sale” prices. In short, even though the circumstances are distressed, the outcome doesn’t have to be, if you execute the process correctly.

 

Why Buyers Pursue Receivership Assets                                                                                          For savvy buyers, receivership sales can be rare opportunities to acquire licensed cannabis assets at significant discounts compared to traditional M&A deals. Distressed sales often reflect temporary hardships rather than long-term potential, allowing well-capitalized purchasers to swoop in at a fraction of the cost of building or buying similar assets in a healthy market. Moreover, because these transactions are court-supervised to protect creditors, the assets are typically sold “free and clear” of liens and encumbrances, giving buyers clean title and minimal legacy risk.

These court-approved auctions enable buyers to unlock hard-to-secure assets – retail licenses in limited markets, fully built-out cultivation facilities, established brands with loyal followings – that would be otherwise difficult or costly to obtain. And since many receivership sales keep the business running through closing (with licenses, staff, and customers still in place), the buyer can step directly into an operating enterprise on Day One. Essentially, you’re acquiring a functioning cannabis business at a distressed valuation, with immediate cash flow upside once you stabilize and optimize under new ownership. For those positioned to move quickly, it’s an attractive way to expand into new markets or verticals at a bargain price.

 

Bottom Line                                                                                                                              Receiverships don’t have to be fire sales. With the right brokered process, transparent bid rules, and pre-cleared closing paths, everyone wins: the court gets certainty, creditors get fair recoveries, buyers capture real upside, and the industry keeps valuable assets as going concerns rather than seeing them fall apart. That’s how you truly maximize value in a cannabis receivership.

 

What You Will Learn:

  • What is a cannabis receivership and why is it becoming more common?
  • How does federal prohibition impact bankruptcy options for cannabis businesses?
  • Why is state-court receivership the preferred process for distressed cannabis companies?
  • How can a disciplined receivership sale preserve value in a struggling cannabis business?
  • What factors determine whether a cannabis receivership sale fetches a strong price?
  • How did the High Times receivership demonstrate demand for cannabis IP and brand assets?
  • What made the StateHouse Holdings receivership one of the largest in U.S. history?
  • How did Element 7 use a Zoom auction to maximize bidder participation?
  • Can large-scale cannabis cultivation facilities, like Canndescent, successfully sell through receivership?
  • What steps should receivers take to design a competitive and court-approvable sale process?
  • How should cannabis assets be packaged to match buyer underwriting expectations?
  • Why is de-risking the closing process critical to maximizing sale value?
  • How can a well-run receivership sale prevent assets from selling for “fire sale” prices?
  • Why are receivership assets attractive to buyers compared to traditional M&A opportunities?

 

 

masterplans logo

Marijuana Business Planning: A Q&A with Mike McCulley

By Aaron G. Biros
No Comments
masterplans logo

MasterPlans, a business planning firm based in Portland, Oregon, has more than 13 years of experience in the emerging cannabis industry. The firm has worked to develop financial models and business plans for new and existing companies that are looking to secure funding, grow partnerships, and manage their long-term strategies for success. They have created business plans for more than 100 companies at every level of the market, from cultivators to dispensaries, to businesses in packaging, security and tourism. They work with nonprofit ventures, investor propositions, commercial lending and self-funded companies.

“We know how difficult it is to launch a business in the cannabis industry, because we work with businesses in this field every day,” says Mike McCulley, VP of Sales at MasterPlans. Cannabis Industry Journal spoke with McCulley to learn more about some of the challenges that marijuana businesses face.

masterplans logo
MasterPlans Cannabis Business Plans

Cannabis Industry Journal: What are some of the biggest hurdles in launching a new grow operation?

Mike McCulley: Many of our cultivation clients say that the largest hurdle they face is in identifying the ideal location for their business. Grow operations need to factor in a wide range of concerns including cost, zoning, security, soil viability (for outdoor operations), energy costs (especially for indoor operations), and proximity to schools and similar buildings. Location can really make or break the success of any grow operation, and this is often the single largest cost incurred when launching this kind of business.

CIJ: What are some key ingredients in a successful marijuana business plan?

McCulley: It probably goes without saying that a successful business plan for a company in the marijuana field first has to execute all of the elements that every business plan needs to include: Detailed financial projections, accurate market analysis, [and] a comprehensive overview of strategies and goals. Marijuana business plans in particular need to also address the key issues and challenges that are unique to operators in this industry. How will your company be impacted by state-level regulations, and how will your operational model address those? What steps will you take to ensure the security of your product? How will you accommodate the complicated issue of accounting while federal regulations are still impacting the way marijuana companies manage their banking? These issues should be acknowledged and addressed if you hope for your plan to be compelling.

CIJ: With the growing schism between recreational and medical markets, how do you determine your target market and meet those customers’ needs?

McCulley: Determining a target market can be difficult before launching operations, but it’s not impossible. A key tool to help work through this question is up-to-date census information or demographics for the area in which your company is serving. Recreational markets provide a much broader audience to become potential clients, but medical markets can also offer lucrative opportunities if an operator can launch in an area with a high concentration of eligible patients. Accurate market data plays a key role in this process, and close analysis of that data can help operators determine their best course of action.