The Super Bowl Is Quietly Becoming Cannabis’ Biggest Retail Moment

By Jon Lowen
No Comments

The Super Bowl has long been one of the most important sales moments of the year for alcohol, food, and consumer packaged goods. Cannabis, however, has been left out of the conversation, often due to regulatory complexity, limited retail data, and conservative planning assumptions. However, new purchase data suggests a missed opportunity.

Cannabis Is Already Part of Super Bowl Weekend

Analysis of cannabis retail sales in conjunction with the surrounding Super Bowl weekend shows a clear and repeatable pattern. Surfside conducted research and found that demand begins rising nearly two weeks before kickoff, peaks the Saturday before the game, and remains elevated through the Monday following the event. In fact, the Saturday before the Super Bowl is the highest cannabis sales day year-to-date in observed markets, with total revenue increases reaching more than 60% above baseline.

The Formats Fueling Super Bowl Sales

Sales growth during Super Bowl weekend is disproportionately fueled by convenience-oriented and social-friendly cannabis formats. Pre-rolls, THC beverages, and concentrates experienced the highest category lifts, with pre-roll sales increasing nearly 90% above average daily sales and THC drinks surging by more than 80%. These formats suggest that cannabis consumption during the Super Bowl mirrors broader party behavior. Consumers are selecting products that are easy to share, quick to consume, and compatible with group settings.

This challenges the assumption that Super Bowl cannabis demand is driven mainly by hosts stocking up in advance. Instead, data indicates that many purchases are driven by guests bringing individual-use products, positioning cannabis as both an alcohol alternative and a companion at watch parties. For retailers, this has meaningful implications for merchandising strategy, bundle planning, and staff education.

The Post-Game Sales Lift

Cannabis sales remain elevated on the Monday following the Super Bowl. Whether driven by physical recovery, stress relief, or new product discovery during the game, consumers continue to purchase at higher-than-normal rates the day after the game.

This sustained demand highlights the importance of maintaining inventory levels beyond game day itself, including vapes, edibles, and flower, which also see meaningful lifts.

How Brands and Retailers Prepare

Tentpole events like the Super Bowl are won before game day, when shoppers are already planning and building baskets. Demand begins rising 10–14 days out, creating a critical window for brands and retailers to activate retail media, capture pre-shoppers, and lock in consideration early.

For brands, this is the moment to amplify visibility where shoppers are browsing. High-impact onsite placements and sponsored product listings ensure products are easy to find as traffic peaks, driving incremental lift that compounds into higher units and sales by the event.

For retailers, elevated website traffic must be converted efficiently. Optimized digital shelves, recommended product listings, and curated collections help turn intent into larger baskets. Even small improvements in product discovery can drive meaningful gains in average order value at scale.

In regulated categories like cannabis, compliant retail media allows brands and retailers to meet increased demand through product visibility and education without overt event-based promotions. The opportunity is to activate early, optimize during peak traffic, and turn heightened attention into measurable revenue.

Winning the Game 

The Super Bowl is no longer just a novelty moment for cannabis retail. It is a measurable, predictable sales event with distinct category behavior and extended impact. As the industry continues to mature, operators that treat major cultural moments with the same analytical rigor as traditional retail sectors will be positioned to drive growth, manage risk, and meet consumer demand effectively.

How Smart Water Filtration Strategies Can Save Cannabis Growers Thousands

By Shu Saito
2 Comments

For licensed cannabis cultivators, water filtration isn’t news. It’s critical infrastructure. Yet treating it as fixed infrastructure rather than an operational cost could be quietly cutting into grower margins.

As operators finalize budgets and review efficiency for the seasons ahead, water quality deserves closer scrutiny. Not just from a plant health perspective, but as a recurring expense that directly impacts profitability in an industry where every percentage point matters.

The Filtration Foundation

In controlled environment agriculture, particularly hydroponic and aeroponic systems, water quality is non-negotiable. Commercial cannabis cultivation typically requires a blank canvas: microbiologically safe water stripped of dissolved solids and contaminants so growers can add back precisely calibrated nutrients.

The industry standard starts with ensuring biological safety (typically through UV treatment, though many operations confidently rely on municipal sources), followed by reverse osmosis to reduce total dissolved solids to near-zero. Pre-filtration with sediment and carbon filters protects the reverse osmosis (RO) membranes from premature fouling, extending their operational life.

This multi-stage approach works. But it comes with ongoing costs that many operations set and forget, until replacement cycles hit harder than anticipated.

The Replacement Reality

RO membranes aren’t permanent. Even with proper pre-filtration and maintenance, commercial membranes in cannabis operations typically require replacement every 2–3 years. Sediment and carbon prefilter cartridges need changing every 6–12 months, depending on source water quality and system load, while backwashing carbon tanks last longer.

The costs add up quickly, particularly with stacked replacement cycles across multiple grow rooms or facilities. For multi-room or multi-facility operations, avoiding even one premature RO membrane replacement or emergency downtime event can translate into thousands of dollars in annual savings.

“While environment, pest control, and genetics all matter, water quality plays an outsized role in achieving desired results,” says Shu Saito, founder and CEO of All Filters, a filtration supplier serving indoor agriculture operations.

“Staying on top of filter maintenance and having replacement components ready means operations never slow down waiting for parts to arrive.”

Where Cannabis Growers Mispend

Not every cultivar demands identical water treatment. Some growers overspend on RO systems for peak capacity they rarely use, paying more upfront and replacing membranes more frequently without improving yields or cannabinoid profiles. Others skimp on pre-filtration to save upfront costs, then watch membranes foul prematurely. A sediment filter protecting an RO membrane extends its operational life significantly, but only if it’s replaced on schedule—or sooner if water quality changes unexpectedly.

The Variable That Changes Everything

Source water quality isn’t static. Municipal water chemistry shifts seasonally. Well water composition can change with weather patterns or aquifer drawdown. Both scenarios can accelerate membrane fouling or require adjustment to pre-filtration strategies.

Regular water testing will catch changes in hardness, chlorine levels, or dissolved solids. Many cultivators test nutrients religiously but may only test source water once during buildout and never again.

Rethinking Water Strategy

Smart operators now treat water treatment as a controllable operational cost with specific levers:

Inventory management: Keeping replacement filters and membranes in stock prevents emergency orders and minimizes downtime.

Scheduled maintenance: Proactive replacement based on volume processed and water quality testing, not waiting for system failure.

Bulk purchasing: Volume discounts on replacement components, particularly for multi-facility operations.

Source water monitoring: Regular testing to catch changes before they accelerate membrane degradation.

Right-sizing systems: Matching filtration capacity to actual demand rather than theoretical maximums.

The goal isn’t cutting corners on water quality. It’s optimizing costs without compromising the precise nutrient control that makes RO essential for commercial cultivation. With energy, labor, and regulatory costs rising, water filtration represents one area where informed purchasing and proactive maintenance deliver measurable improvements to the bottom line.

Starting with water that’s both safe and pure isn’t optional. How growers manage that requirement, and what it costs annually, absolutely is.

Why Most Cannabis COGS Would Fail an Audit — and How Operators Can Fix It

By David Kay, CPA, CMA, CFE
No Comments

For cannabis operators, the cost of goods sold (COGS) is far more than an accounting line item.  It’s the most critical financial number in the entire business.

Under IRC Section 280E, most ordinary business deductions are disallowed, making COGS the primary mechanism for reducing taxable income.  At the same time, COGS drives pricing decisions, product profitability analysis, capital investment planning, and ultimately enterprise value.

Yet in practice, many cannabis operators run COGS systems that would struggle to withstand audit scrutiny—and even more concerning, fail to reflect the true economic cost of producing their products.

The result is dual exposure: elevated tax risk on one side, and distorted business decision-making on the other.

COGS Defensibility Is Not an “Aggressive Tax Strategy”

A common misconception about cannabis is that maximizing COGS is primarily a tax exercise.  Operators often focus on what they believe can be included rather than what can be consistently substantiated, documented, and operationally supported.

True COGS defensibility rests on four pillars:

  1. Substantiation – Can each cost be supported by payroll records, invoices, time tracking, inventory movements, and production documentation?
  2. Consistency – Are allocation methodologies applied the same way, period after period?
  3. Traceability – Can costs be directly tied to physical production activities and inventory flows?
  4. Operational alignment – Do accounting numbers reflect how the facility actually operates?

When any of these pillars are weak, audit exposure increases — and financial insight deteriorates.

Importantly, defensible COGS isn’t only about minimizing tax liability.  Accurate costing enables operators to understand true unit economics, identify profitable SKUs, set pricing intelligently, evaluate yield performance, and allocate capital effectively.  Tax optimization becomes a byproduct of operational discipline rather than a risky accounting maneuver.

 

Why IRS Scrutiny Is Increasing — Not Decreasing

Some operators assume that potential federal rescheduling will materially reduce audit pressure or eliminate the importance of rigorous COGS practices.  That assumption is premature.

Even if cannabis ultimately moves to Schedule III, timing remains uncertain, implementation will take time, and open tax years will remain subject to existing 280E rules.  Historical returns remain examinable, and enforcement activity does not unwind retroactively.

At the same time:

  • The IRS has developed greater institutional knowledge of cannabis operations.
  • Digital payroll systems, banking records, and seed-to-sale data have improved audit visibility.
  • Prior enforcement cycles have highlighted recurring weaknesses in labor classification and inventory controls.

Audit standards are tightening, not loosening.

Where Most Cannabis COGS Break Down

Across cultivation, manufacturing, extraction, and retail operations, several failure patterns consistently appear.

Labor Misclassification

Production labor is often blended with administrative, compliance, or sales functions.  Without time studies, job costing, or consistent labor tracking, allocations become subjective and difficult to defend.

Unsupported Overhead Allocations

Facilities frequently allocate rent, utilities, depreciation, and indirect labor using informal spreadsheets or percentage assumptions that are not grounded in measurable production drivers.

Inventory Accuracy Gaps

Cycle counts are inconsistent.  Work-in-process tracking is incomplete.  Adjustments lack documentation.  Reconciliation between physical inventory, accounting systems, and seed-to-sale platforms is often weak.

Manual Processes and Spreadsheets

Critical cost calculations are often stored in individual spreadsheets with limited version control, audit trails, or governance.

Weak Documentation Culture

Standard operating procedures, allocation methodologies, and change management processes are rarely formalized.

Individually, these issues may seem manageable.  Collectively, they undermine both audit defensibility and business intelligence.

Seed-to-Sale Systems Are Not Cost Accounting Systems

State-mandated seed-to-sale platforms were designed primarily for regulatory traceability, not financial accuracy.  They track weights, transfers, and compliance events, but they don’t calculate labor absorption, overhead allocation, yield efficiency, or true unit economics.

Operators often assume that because inventory exists in the seed-to-sale process, COGS must therefore be accurate.  That assumption is incorrect.

Seed-to-sale data must be reconciled and integrated into accounting systems using disciplined costing logic before it becomes financially reliable.

Why COGS Accuracy Improves Business Performance

Defensible COGS delivers far more than tax protection.

When costs are properly captured and allocated, operators gain:

  • Accurate SKU profitability – Identifying which products truly drive margin versus consume resources.
  • Pricing discipline – Setting prices based on real cost structures rather than market guesswork.
  • Yield optimization insight – Revealing where losses, rework, or inefficiencies erode margin.
  • Capital allocation clarity – Understanding which processes justify automation or expansion.
  • Financial credibility – Strengthening lender confidence, investor trust, and exit readiness.

In short, accurate costing becomes a management tool, not just a compliance requirement.

What Defensible COGS Looks Like in Practice

High-performing operators increasingly implement:

  • Time tracking and labor studies to support production labor classification.
  • Bills of material and routings to establish standard production models.
  • Documented allocation methodologies tied to measurable operational drivers.
  • Routine cycle counts and reconciliations across physical inventory, accounting records, and seed-to-sale systems.
  • Formal SOPs and change controls governing costing logic.
  • Automated accounting workflows to reduce spreadsheet dependency and strengthen audit trails.

These controls improve both audit readiness and operational clarity.

Practical Steps Operators Can Take Now

Operators don’t need enterprise-scale systems to materially improve COGS integrity.  Several foundational actions create immediate value:

  1. Document current labor classifications and identify inconsistencies.
  2. Validate overhead allocation logic against real production drivers.
  3. Implement regular inventory cycle counts with reconciliation discipline.
  4. Standardize cost calculation templates with version control.
  5. Formalize costing policies and assumptions in writing.
  6. Reconcile seed-to-sale quantities to accounting balances monthly.
  7. Treat COGS as a management system, not merely a tax calculation.

The Bottom Line

Most cannabis operators do not fail COGS audits because of aggressive intent.  They fail because their systems, documentation, and operational alignment are not mature enough to support the numbers they report.

Building defensible COGS strengthens tax compliance, improves decision quality, enhances financial credibility, and positions the business for sustainable profitability and long-term value.

In an industry facing margin compression, capital pressure, and increasing regulatory scrutiny, accurate cost intelligence is no longer optional.  It’s strategic infrastructure.

 

While Everyone Waits for 280E Relief, Smart Cannabis CEOs Are Creating Their Own

By Darren Gleeman
No Comments

For years, cannabis executives have built their financial strategies around a single hope: that Section 280E would vanish with federal reform. But hope has quietly drained billions from balance sheets. Every year, operators “wait it out”; they forfeit the one thing they can’t afford to lose, cash flow.

It’s an understandable reflex. No one likes paying taxes they shouldn’t owe, and 280E has always felt temporary. But the reality is clear: Washington doesn’t move on cannabis at the pace business requires. Operators who treat legislative change as a business plan are gambling with time, liquidity, and their company’s future.

 

The Cost of Waiting

Under 280E, cannabis companies can’t deduct ordinary and necessary business expenses, resulting in effective tax rates that often exceed 70%. That burden has crushed margins and stalled reinvestment. The irony is that while leaders lobby for relief, the IRS already provides a legal framework that can make 280E’s impact completely irrelevant: the Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP).

An ESOP, when structured properly, allows companies that are 100% employee-owned to operate entirely income-tax-free at both the federal and state levels. In cannabis, where every after-tax dollar counts, that can double available cash flow.

ESOPs work by selling ownership of the company to a trust that holds shares on behalf of employees. The founder receives liquidity, the company gains a massive tax advantage, and employees become genuine stakeholders in its success.

An ESOP allows a company to keep more of what it earns. Instead of sending large sums to the IRS, those funds stay in the business where they can support growth and stability.

Proof in Practice: Theory Wellness

When Theory Wellness became the first cannabis company in the U.S. to sell to its employees via an ESOP, it didn’t just make history. It proved what was possible. By transitioning to employee ownership, Theory Wellness created a structure that aligned purpose with profitability. The company retained its culture, rewarded long-time staff, and unlocked a permanent tax exemption that removed the vice-grip 280E had on the company’s finances.

That move wasn’t theoretical; it was financial engineering in action. In many industries, companies that share ownership with their teams tend to keep employees longer and run more efficiently. When people have a real stake in the outcome, they’re more invested in helping the business grow.

Cannabis remains capital-starved. Banks are hesitant, and equity investors often require terms that founders don’t want. An ESOP is a sale to an employee trust at fair market value. It delivers liquidity now, potential deferral of capital gains for the seller, and powerful company-level tax benefits, zero federal and state income tax when 100% ESOP-owned, so cash flow rises. Founders can stay to manage the business post-sale and, if structured correctly, receive warrants that allow a future buyback at today’s low equity value. 280E becomes irrelevant, the board still governs, and the company stays independent of outside buyers.

Additionally, ESOPs are fully compliant with current IRS regulations. This is the farthest thing from a loophole or gray area. It’s an established structure used for decades in mainstream industries. Brands like Publix, King Arthur Baking, and Clif Bar have thrived under employee ownership. Cannabis companies can do the same, yet few know it’s possible.

 

A Shift in Mindset: From Operator to Financial Engineer

The next phase of cannabis leadership requires a shift in perspective. Founders and executive teams can no longer afford to think only like operators; they must think like engineers of capital. Waiting for Congress to fix 280E is not a strategy. It’s an expensive form of denial.

When structured with discipline, an ESOP allows leaders to:

  • Eliminate income tax entirely for employee-owned entities.
  • Reinvest tax savings directly into expansion and talent retention.
  • Secure liquidity for founders while maintaining operational control.
  • Build lasting employee loyalty through true ownership.

The Call to Action

As 2026 approaches, the winners in cannabis won’t be those who waited for policy change. They’ll be the ones who engineered their own relief. They’ll be the CEOs who saw 280E for what it was, a constraint that forced financial creativity and turned it into a competitive advantage.

For decades, ESOPs have helped companies outside cannabis grow faster, last longer, and outperform peers. Now, they’re poised to do the same here. The model is legal, repeatable, and transformative. The only question is whether leaders will seize the opportunity or keep waiting for a political rescue that may never come.

The future of cannabis finance belongs to the builders, not the bystanders. In this industry, time is the one asset that’s still taxable.

The Hidden Costs of Getting HR Wrong in Cannabis Startups

By Marc Rodriguez
1 Comment

When a new cannabis business starts hiring, the focus is usually on speed. You need people to pack, label, deliver, and sell. Payroll and HR often come later—until a compliance notice, tax penalty, or angry employee forces attention. By that point, “later” has turned into a crisis.

I’ve watched that scene play out too many times. A founder with great instincts and a solid product suddenly spends more time fixing payroll errors than growing the company. It’s not because they don’t care about their people; it’s because cannabis is one of the most complex payroll environments in the country, and few startups realize just how high the stakes are.

 

When small mistakes turn into big bills

In cannabis, there’s almost no such thing as a “minor” HR problem. Misclassify one worker, skip a local tax requirement, or miscalculate overtime, and the costs add up fast. I’ve seen small dispensaries pay tens of thousands in back wages and fines for errors that started with a single missed box on a form. For operators already fighting 280E and tight margins, that kind of surprise can wreck a quarter’s profits.

Replacing experienced staff in this market isn’t easy. It’s not just about the money, either. Payroll mistakes shake employee trust. It usually starts small, a missed overtime payment, a confusing benefits update. At first, no one panics; it just feels like another small issue. But soon, people start asking questions, and before leadership even realizes it, trust has started to slip. 

Every team hits a rough patch. But when people stop feeling supported, that dip turns into something deeper. Tasks drag, small frustrations grow, and soon the best people, the ones holding everything together, decide to walk. Replacing them doesn’t fix the problem if the culture that drove them out stays the same.

 

Why it happens so often

Early cannabis companies tend to move faster than their infrastructure. In cannabis startups, it’s common for one person to handle payroll, HR, and operations simultaneously. Most turn to simple payroll apps or spreadsheets because they’re cheap and familiar. But once the business grows, those systems start showing cracks. They can’t manage multi-state taxes, track deductions correctly, or stay aligned with cannabis compliance requirements.

I always tell new operators: if your payroll, benefits, and compliance systems aren’t talking to each other, you’re already behind. HR isn’t just paperwork, it’s the foundation that keeps your business stable as you grow.

 

How to build HR the right way

Start with visibility. Take a step back and make sure you actually know your team on paper. Who works where? Who’s full-time, part-time, or contract? Getting that right is half the battle. The other half is checking the local laws that cover each group because every jurisdiction plays by its own rules. In cannabis, those rules shift from one city or county to the next, and not knowing them won’t protect you when an audit happens.

Once you’ve got the basics down, invest in tools that make life easier, not harder. I’ve seen too many startups buy expensive software that looks great in demos but doesn’t fit their size or workflow. The best systems are the quiet ones that keep you compliant without extra effort: where payroll connects with timekeeping, benefits, and accounting, so nothing slips through the cracks. It ensures that every hour worked and dollar earned is tracked correctly for the first time.

Finally, invest in expertise. You don’t need to build an HR department overnight. What you need is someone who knows payroll compliance inside and out and understands how cannabis regulations make things more complicated. A good advisor can catch small issues early, before they become costly problems.

 

The payoff: confidence and credibility

Once HR is running smoothly, you gain more than compliance; you gain control. Predictable payroll and clear processes make it easier to plan, invest, and scale without chaos leading the way. Employees trust leadership because paychecks are accurate, benefits make sense, and investors see a business that’s not just compliant but professional and ready to scale.

Cannabis operators talk a lot about growth and innovation, but stability doesn’t get enough credit. A strong HR foundation gives you the confidence to expand, take on new markets, and bring in outside capital without worrying that your back office will crack under pressure.

I’ve built my career helping operators navigate the balance between moving fast and staying compliant, between ambition and accountability. In an industry where one wrong move can bring regulators to your door, building structure early isn’t a luxury. It’s survival. And if you do it right, it becomes your competitive edge.

 

2026 Trends in Cannabis Labeling

By Travis Wayne
1 Comment

As the cannabis industry continues to mature, labeling will continue to shape the way for product identification and consumer safety. Looking ahead to 2026, cannabis businesses face growing pressure to improve accuracy, strengthen compliance, streamline production, and build trust with both regulators and consumers. The most successful organizations will modernize their labeling workflows by focusing on three key areas: traceability, sustainability, and compliant yet compelling design.

The importance of compliant cannabis labeling

Labeling directly affects product safety, regulatory compliance, and brand reputation. As cannabis recalls continue to surface in major states such as New York, Colorado, California, and Missouri, businesses are under pressure from regulators to improve labeling compliance. In 2025, Colorado alone saw 465 recalls on cannabis products compared to the 333 recalls in 2024, according to the Colorado Department of Revenue’s Marijuana Enforcement Division.

Mislabeling, whether related to THC or CBD content, allergens, strain names, dosage instructions, or legal warnings, can quickly lead to recalls. Not only do they disrupt production, but they can also negatively impact brand reputation and be dangerous for consumers.

Labeling is no longer an operational task; it supports growth, credibility, and competitive strength. As the industry looks toward 2026, three major trends are shaping the future of cannabis labeling.

Trend 1: Traceability

Traceability is becoming one of the most critical elements of cannabis labeling. With increasingly advanced seed-to-sale tracking systems, regulators want clearer documentation of product movement, and a label serves as a key part of that chain of custody.

Label elements like Lot or batch numbers, serialization, and scannable data (such as QR codes) are now essential. These details support:

  • Faster recall execution if an issue is identified
  • Clearer accountability when liability questions arise
  • Greater confidence that what’s inside the package matches what’s on the label

This is pushing cannabis companies to adopt labeling systems that connect directly to Metrc, BioTrack, and business systems like ERP or LIMS, rather than relying on manual text entry that can lead to errors.

What this means for cannabis businesses:

Businesses should prioritize label security and traceability software. Labeling software like that can give you full control and traceability of label design, secure label storage in a central repository, and accurate printing to support compliance with cannabis regulations. Being able to reprint accurate labels quickly, maintain audit trails, and prove data integrity may ultimately protect brands both legally and operationally. With security and traceability software, eliminate questions like “who approved label 9?” or “why is file version 14 final?” and ensure full traceability of your labels.

Trend 2: Sustainable labeling

Sustainability has become a defining factor in packaging conversations across consumer goods industries, and cannabis is no exception. Environmentally conscious consumers want greener options, and brands must respond by rethinking their packaging and labeling materials.

However, sustainable labeling in cannabis isn’t as simple as switching material types. Labels must be durable enough to withstand handling, moisture, refrigeration, and regulatory print requirements while remaining legible throughout the product lifecycle.

Growing areas of focus include:

  • Recyclable or compostable label materials
  • Linerless labels that reduce material waste
  • Smarter printing workflows to limit rework

Sustainability isn’t only about material selection; inefficiency is also waste. Incorrect or damaged labels can lead to unnecessary waste and higher labeling costs due to additional rework. Professional labeling software can help reduce reprints by ensuring accuracy from the start.

What this means for cannabis businesses:

Businesses should carefully evaluate material options and label with a provider that understands the nuances of cannabis labeling. Businesses can also get a sustainability win by automating their label printing. Automation integrates your existing seed-to-sale system to send print jobs to virtually any number of printers in a fraction of a second. It can also help reduce labeling errors by removing manual processes. Ultimately, automation is the most effective way to reduce waste in the labeling process.

Trend 3: Professional, compliant labeling

Cannabis labels must now do more than ever: communicate compliance details, ensure safety and clarity, and remain a powerful branding tool, all while remaining compliant. Cannabis labeling requirements vary by state, but the core requirements generally remain the same.

Cannabis labels need to include:

  • Product name
  • Prominent THC/CBD potency information
  • Batch or Lot number
  • Mandatory warnings and legal text
  • Ingredient or allergen statements
  • Child safety and responsible use messaging
  • Brand identity elements such as logos, colors, and storytelling

A brand’s product label should be unique and creative, telling the product’s story and how the business wants consumers to feel when purchasing it. However, arguably more important is ensuring compliance.

What this means for cannabis businesses:

Labels should be visually appealing and market-ready, but every design decision must support regulatory compliance and consumer trust. Professional cannabis label design software allows brands to achieve both. Some labeling providers offer state-specific cannabis label samples that companies can leverage to help create compliant labels.

Case Study: Green Aloha modernized its labeling

Modernizing labeling can be as simple as switching your manual labeling process to professional label design software. Green Aloha is an example of a cannabis business that needed stronger labeling. Green Aloha grows all its cannabis on the island of Kauai, Hawaii. To comply with new state regulatory requirements, the information Green Aloha previously listed on an insert with packages must now be included on the small package labels.

Green Aloha used TEKLYNX’s proprietary Confident LIMS label printing form, which includes four predefined label templates in CODESOFT label design software, 18–24 variable data fields (net weight, percentage of each cannabinoid, dosage, etc.), and a QR code dynamically linked to sample test results. The results?

  • Met label compliance in less than a week
  • Avoided closure and lost revenue
  • Reached 100% labeling accuracy

Read the full case study.

How to keep labeling running smoothly in 2026

Labeling connects compliance, consumer safety, and brand credibility. With recalls becoming more frequent and liability questions more complex, labeling accuracy and accountability are no longer optional.

In 2026, the cannabis leaders will be those who embrace smarter labeling strategies built around traceability, sustainability, and professional-looking labels. These aren’t just trends shaping the industry’s future; they’re the foundation of cannabis labeling.

Cannabis Payments in 2026: Why Technology Will Move Faster Than Congress

By Mark Lewis
No Comments

For more than a decade, the cannabis industry has been stuck in a state of contradictions: fully legal in many states and fully illegal at the federal level. When it comes to finances, the result is a sector with modern retail expectations supported by armored cars, cash drops, and payment workarounds duct taped together.

Looking forward, 2026 is shaping up as a break-open year, not because Congress will suddenly save the sector or rescheduling might pull through to gain voter attention in a mid-term election year, but because technology is finally maturing enough to do what legislation hasn’t: Create a more secure and affordable payments environment.

The political noise around cannabis banking is louder than ever. SAFE Banking legislation, rescheduling, or administrative reform all might offer relief, but even if Washington acts, payments will not suddenly normalize. Card networks won’t flip a switch, national banks won’t onboard en masse, and operators won’t wake up able to ditch cash.

The catalyst for real change isn’t Congress, it’s technology.

The Status Quo: Legality Without Infrastructure

State-legal cannabis businesses can open bank accounts, but only with smaller institutions willing to shoulder the compliance overhead. The big players like Bank of America are uninterested in the enhanced due diligence, ongoing transaction monitoring, and reporting obligations. Finding those banks that will work fairly with cannabis operators can feel like looking for a needle in a haystack.

Payments are even more constrained, as credit card processing is functionally off the table without workarounds. Even those tricks are starting to show cracks, as anything resembling the “cashless ATM” era is now scrutinized or shut down, and in 2025, we saw crackdowns on major players like Trulieve.

All while running a normal business, cannabis operators face higher compliance costs. Ask any operator what keeps them up at night, and the answer rarely begins with politics. It’s cash flow.

Because payment processors may hold reserves, delay settlement, or freeze funds when compliance alerts are triggered, retailers often experience unpredictable access to their own money. Liquidity becomes a moving target. Vendors wait. Payroll can go unanswered. Inventory decisions get narrower and more conservative.

The irony is that cannabis retailers are not looking for exotic financial products. They want what any bakery or hardware store has: predictable payments, stable banking, transparent fees, and the ability to focus on their business operations instead of compliance.

Where Technology Finally Steps In

What makes 2026 different isn’t a shift in legality; it’s a shift in capability. After years of patchwork approaches, tech-driven financial infrastructure has finally caught up to cannabis, and it is reshaping payments from the inside out.

The evolution centers on three areas:

  1. Card and Mobile Payments
    Cash isn’t just challenging to track; it’s also expensive for a business. Between the armored cars and security requirements, things add up quickly. The same technology principles behind mainstream apps like Venmo, Apple Pay, and even Starbucks Rewards can and should be adapted by cannabis operators seeking to modernize their payment systems.
  2. Real-Time Settlement through Innovative Payment Rails                  New rails make it possible for cannabis transactions to settle rapidly, often same-day, at a fraction of traditional high-risk processing costs seen in credit card and ACH rail infrastructure. Faster settlement stabilizes cash flow — the single biggest pain point in the industry — and shrinks the financial drag that comes with uncertainty. Tapping tech that understands both open and closed payment rails will only support an operator.
  1. Shutdown-Proof Infrastructure
    None of this innovation works if your bank or Visa finds out you are working in cannabis and closes your account, leaving you in the lurch. For Lüt, not only have we structured our payment rails to stay compliant in high-risk industries, but we’ve also created a multi-cloud server system so that if one server has an outage, another is already seamlessly supporting operations. If your payment support does not have a plan for network system outages, your operations will still be vulnerable. 

Smart tech is consolidating into a unified system. Instead of operators scrambling from one unreliable processor to another, they get stability, transparent pricing, and a cash-flow infrastructure anchored in technology and user-friendly interfaces rather than workarounds. This isn’t theoretical. It’s already happening, and operators adopting these systems are seeing lower fees, fewer outages, and dramatically improved financial liberty.

What About SAFE Banking and Rescheduling?

If SAFE Banking or rescheduling becomes a reality, banks will feel more confident providing services for the cannabis industry. However, confidence doesn’t equal capability, and the changes won’t happen overnight. For every state that has created an adult-use or medical program, it’s taken years for an actual sale to happen. Rescheduling and new federal laws won’t buck the trend here. 

That’s why the technology being built today is so critical. We know that rescheduling will help medical research, but the rest is uncertain and far off. Operators that modernize in 2026 will be positioned for true cash, whenever it finally arrives.

Cannabis doesn’t need to wait for Congress to improve payments. The real transformation is already underway, built not from policy but from engineering. Automated compliance, closed-loop payment rails, and real-time settlements from innovative tech design are doing what laws haven’t yet done, creating a safer and more predictable payments environment.

2026’s winners won’t be the ones who bet on legislative rescue. They’ll be the ones who bet on technology.

 

What Cannabis Branding Gets Right and Why Every Industry Should Follow Suit

By Will Read
1 Comment

81% of consumers need to trust a brand before they’ll even consider buying from it.
But what happens when your industry is built on a shaky foundation—one full of stigma, skepticism, or confusion? That’s cannabis. And yet, some of the sharpest, most strategic brand-building I’ve seen is happening here… because it has to.

There’s no legacy trust to coast on. No Nike or Apple to borrow credibility from. Cannabis brands must earn legitimacy from scratch. In doing so, they’ve developed a blueprint for building trust through branding—one that applies to any industry trying to educate, normalize, or shift perceptions.

If you’re in an emerging or controversial market like clean energy, crypto, AI, alternative proteins, or even telehealth, you might have more in common with cannabis than you think.

Build a Brand That Belongs on the Shelf

When we launched our cannabis-focused creative agency, we had one rule: No clichés. That meant ditching the dripping paint-style fonts, overused pot leaves, and “green cross” tropes. These familiar signals might appeal to those who are already fans of cannabis, but they alienate everyone else.

If cannabis was ever going to be accepted as normal, it had to look normal. So we borrowed from brands doing it right:

  • Haus, the apéritif startup that made shelf-ready elegance look effortless
  • Function of Beauty, which turned personalized shampoo into an aesthetic experience
  • Oatly, which took a bland pantry item and made it bold, weird, and fun

We took cues from food, wellness, skincare, and beverages. The result? Clients who embraced this shift saw more traction from new consumers, more investor interest, and better retailer placement.

Lesson: Design like you belong. Legitimacy starts with presentation.

 

Don’t Only Market to the Converted, Speak to the “Maybe”

I’m that “stoner” guy. I love the plant, the culture, and the history. But cannabis brands don’t need to market to me. I’m already sold. 

If your brand looks like an inside joke, don’t be surprised when no one gets it. 

The bigger opportunity? The curious majority. People who are interested, but cautious. Think: your mom, your neighbor, your accountant. Most brands in misunderstood markets make the mistake of building for themselves—speaking in jargon, chasing trends, ignoring outsiders.

It’s the same trap crypto fell into with meme coins and “degens,” or early alt-meat brands that pushed sci-fi over sustainability. If your product needs education or reassurance to grow, build for the people still on the fence.

Lesson: Talk to the “maybe,” not just the converted. That’s where the growth lives.

 

Make Clarity the Core of Your Brand System

In cannabis, there’s no trust without clarity. Customers want to know:

  • Is this legal?
  • How will this make me feel?
  • Will this uplift or ruin my Tuesday?

That’s not just a product issue—it’s a branding one. A strong identity system doesn’t just look good; it helps customers understand what they’re getting, why it matters, and why they can trust you.

Some of our most effective work includes:

  • Educational icon systems
  • Clear, welcoming copy
  • Visual storytelling that demystifies the experience

Compare that to biotech, FinTech, or wellness, where opaque language and over-design often make consumers feel excluded or overwhelmed.

Lesson: If people don’t get it, they won’t trust it. And they definitely won’t buy it.

 

Branding Isn’t Just Design, It’s How You Earn Legitimacy

When your industry is stigmatized or brand-new, marketing isn’t optional. It’s how you show up in the world. Your brand is your handshake, your elevator pitch, your shot at saying: “We’re legit, and we’re here for you.”

We’ve seen this with cannabis, yes, but also with:

  • BetterHelp, which helped normalize online therapy by making mental health feel approachable
  • Thrive Market, which built trust in alternative food products through transparency and values
  • Lalo, the baby gear brand that made parenting feel less overwhelming through minimalist design and real-talk messaging

These brands didn’t win by shouting the loudest. They won by showing up smart, clear, and consistently human.

Lesson: Trust isn’t given. It’s designed, tested, and earned brick by brick.

 

The Takeaway for Any Brand in a Misunderstood Space

If your product or service lives at the edge of acceptance, the playbook is simple, but not necessarily easy:

  • Look like you belong: Ditch the clichés and project confidence
  • Speak to outsiders: Your future customers aren’t already bought in
  • Educate without overwhelming: Help people feel informed, not intimidated
  • Build for trust: Every brand touchpoint should reinforce credibility

When industries are battling stigma, regulation, or consumer skepticism, strategic branding isn’t a luxury; it’s a lifeline. Cannabis didn’t progress into a brand-forward industry because it was cool. It evolved that way because it had to. And now that it has, every brand with perception hurdles can take a cue from what cannabis got right.

 

Why Cannabis Cultivation Needs a “Soil to Shelf” Standard

By Steve Garner
No Comments

In cannabis cultivation today, many decisions are made in response to market pressures such as speed, yield, and potency. But after two decades in both cannabis cultivation and commercial horticulture, I’ve come to believe that the most valuable outcomes, both for consumers and cultivators, are the result of a plant and product-forward process, not shortcuts. Too often, the industry arrives at the conclusion that craft quality and scaling operations are at odds with each other but, more often, this is due to a lack of knowledge, skill, or both.

A truly sustainable, trustworthy cultivation model demands a broader view – one that considers everything from crop health to post-harvest transparency. What my company, Ethos Cannabis, calls a “Soil to Shelf” mindset isn’t about one system or method. It’s about re-centering the values of integrity, transparency, and plant expression in an industry that too often prioritizes efficiency over quality.

 

Remediation Isn’t a Strategy, It’s a Red Flag

Remediation, whether through irradiation, ozone treatment, or other post-harvest processes, has become common practice in large-scale cannabis operations. For many cultivators, it’s a backstop when microbial contamination arises due to any number of factors.

But here’s the uncomfortable truth: if cannabis requires remediation to pass testing, something went wrong upstream.

The growing reliance on post-harvest correction raises concerns not only about product integrity but also about transparency. Patients and consumers often have no way of knowing if what they’re purchasing has undergone remediation despite meaningful differences in chemical profile, freshness, and potential therapeutic impact.

There’s a place for risk mitigation, of course. But the industry must ask: Are we normalizing band-aids for systemic cultivation issues rather than solving for the root causes?

 

Fundamentals and Crop-First Decisions

Similar to the trap of remediation, making decisions from a fundamental and crop-first perspective is one of the biggest differentiators between those who focus on quality and those who focus on shortcuts. While these fundamental decisions are often costly and not as ‘easy’ as doing things the standard, mass production model, we believe the end quality and consistency stand on their own.

A few examples from our cultivation facilities include:

  • Utilizing tissue culture labs to maintain disease and viroid-free mother stock
  • A design process for all cultivation facilities that is led by the same team that operates the facilities
  • Taking no shortcuts during the design process to ensure food-safe quality construction, redundancy with all equipment and systems that impact product quality, and remote monitoring capability to limit the risk of crop loss
  • No foliar IPM applications after day 21 of flower, to prevent any reduction in flower quality
  • Strict water, air, and surface sanitation protocols to create the most sterile environment possible
  • Irrigation and fertility programs that are strain-specific instead of a ‘one size fits all’ model
  • High-end HVAC, humidification, and dehumidification systems in all propagation, grow, dry, cure and vault spaces to ensure ideal growth or storage conditions at all stages of the process to limit

We at Ethos have a firm belief that if we build the right way the first time, evaluate and cultivate strong genetics, and intervene in the crop as little as possible, we will get the best expression of the plant that we possibly can. Quality is not about how much you do, it’s about how little you can do to get in the way of what nature does best.

 

The THC Trap: Potency as Proxy

The current market rewards high THC numbers, despite growing evidence that potency alone is a poor predictor of consumer experience or therapeutic value. That dynamic creates a loop where growers chase THC-dominant phenotypes, often at the expense of chemovar diversity or minor cannabinoid development. It’s a narrow definition of quality.

In practice, some of the most complex, effective, and enjoyable cultivars are those with moderate THC but robust terpene profiles and balanced cannabinoid ratios. These profiles don’t always win lab label wars, but they tend to resonate more deeply with patients and seasoned consumers alike.

A recent example of Ethos’s efforts to reverse this trend is the introduction of our Landrace Sativa line in Pennsylvania. We worked with landrace genetics (think heirloom varieties that have been cultivated regionally for hundreds of years) from Colombia, Mexico, Pakistan, Burma, and beyond to deliver a diverse range of THC and CBD, along with unique terpene profiles. These genetics, while not as commercially desirable as 30%+ THC, have delivered medical benefits to our patients that are simply not available from 99%+ of modern genetics.

Reframing “quality” to include a broader set of metrics—total active cannabinoid content, terpene expression, cultivation transparency—is critical if the industry wants to evolve beyond novelty and hype.

 

Cultivation Ethics and Consumer Trust

When we talk about cultivation standards, we’re really talking about consumer trust. Especially in medical markets, patients rely on consistent, clean, and fully disclosed products. That trust is built, or eroded, in the cultivation facility long before the product reaches retail.

Decisions are made in that facility, including whether to select for certain genetics, how to manage pests, when to harvest, how to cure, and how to accumulate into the final product. Every shortcut carries a consequence. Every tradeoff eventually meets the end user.

In an industry still working to shed its legacy of prohibition and stigma, building that trust through transparency and consistency may be one of the most important outcomes cultivation teams can deliver.

 

The Case for Systems Thinking in Cultivation

“Soil to Shelf” isn’t a program. It’s a framework, one that encourages cultivators to treat each stage of the process as interconnected and consequential. That includes:

  • Environmental inputs: Are systems designed for plant health, or simply speed and yield?
  • Genetic decisions: Are phenotypes selected based on their marketability or their full-spectrum potential?
  • Post-harvest practices: Is the flower able to stand on its own, or is it being “rescued” in processing?
  • Labeling and education: Are consumers equipped to understand what they’re using and why it matters?

There’s no single formula. But systems built with intention tend to produce products with integrity.

 

Where the Industry Can Go From Here

Cannabis cultivation is at a crossroads. The drive toward scale, automation, and standardization has brought many benefits but also introduced blind spots. As new states legalize and new operators enter the space, there’s an opportunity to pause and ask what kind of industry we are building.

One possible answer: an industry that values how something is grown as much as what is grown. An industry that realizes quality and profit are not at odds with each other, one is dependent on the other. One that educates consumers on more than THC content. And one that views post-harvest remediation not as a default, but as a signal that bigger changes may be needed upstream.

We have a chance to raise the bar for cultivation ethics and product quality. That won’t come from chasing the next trend, but from recommitting to the fundamentals: science, transparency, and respect for the plant.

Is The Industry In Danger of Losing Its Prized Genetics?

By Michael Kudrewicz
1 Comment
In cannabis, everything begins with genetics. Before lighting, curing, irrigation, or any cultivation technique, there is the seed. And within that seed lives more than chemistry. It holds history, culture, and potential. Genetics are the soul of cannabis. They determine whether a cultivar expresses citrus or earth, calm or clarity, relief or joy. They decide how a plant grows, how it finishes, and how it makes you feel. Unfortunately, many cannabis brands are ignoring genetics, the very foundation of the plant, and are instead chasing high THC percentages. This is an approach that will fail in the long term. Here’s why.

Every cultivar carries its own blueprint, a genetic code that dictates how cannabinoids and terpenes develop, how the plant responds to stress, and what kind of experience it ultimately delivers. When cultivators and consumers focus solely on THC, they flatten that expression. The result is potency without personality; high numbers with low resonance.

Strategic cannabis companies seek cultivars that preserve complexity and depth. For example, landrace and heirloom strains that contain rare cannabinoid combinations and terpene structures work in harmony. These genetics invite the consumer into an experience that unfolds slowly and lingers with intention. It’s not about acceleration. It’s about elevation.

A lower THC percentage combined with a robust terpene profile does not dull the experience; it refines it. These cultivars offer layered effects that feel grounded and personal, supporting mood, focus, creativity, or calm in ways that are both nuanced and enduring. Rather than a sharp spike and sudden drop, properly bred genetics create a high that breathes and evolves over time. This is where cannabis becomes more than a product and transforms into a true experience.

The industry’s fixation on THC has come at a cost. When potency becomes the only goal, terpene diversity diminishes and minor cannabinoids disappear. These compounds are essential to the plant’s character. They drive entourage effects, enhance therapeutic value, and influence how the body and mind respond. High THC without balanced genetics is like turning the volume to ten on one instrument while muting the rest of the band. It’s loud, but not music.

Choosing cannabis should never be about chasing the highest number on a label. It should be about choosing intention. Cultivars with preserved lineage and authentic expression don’t overpower; they meet you where you are and elevate you from within. This approach honors the plant, the cultivator, and the consumer alike.

More people are beginning to realize that cannabis is about more than THC. It is about expression, connection, and the quality of effect. The next chapter of cannabis culture will not be written by percentages but by those who respect genetics and preserve what makes each cultivar unique.

Genetics matter because cannabis is more than a commodity. It is a living lineage, carried forward through cultivation with passion, precision, and purity. Choose strains with a story, flower with roots, and genetics that invite you into the full spectrum of what cannabis can be.

Listen to an interview with the founders of Raven View Genetics on the Innovating Cannabis Podcast. Or watch on YouTube.